Tribunal includes comparables, excludes E-Clerx, upholds +/-5% tolerance band for arm's length pricing

The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to include R Systems International Ltd., CG VAK Software and Exports Pvt. Ltd., and Jindal Intellicom Pvt. Ltd. as comparables while excluding E-Clerx Services Ltd. This decision aimed to ensure the assessee's pricing with associated enterprises remains within the tolerance band of +/-5%, meeting arm's length requirements. Consequently, the cross objections raised by the assessee were partly allowed, rendering the adjudication of the Revenue appeal as academic and hence dismissed as infructuous.

---

---

Issues:
Inclusion and exclusion of comparables for transfer pricing analysis.

Analysis:
1. Inclusion of Comparables:
- R Systems International Ltd.: The Tribunal held that R Systems International Ltd. is a good comparable with the assessee based on functional similarities and past decisions.
- CG VAK Software and Exports Ltd.: Despite past losses, this company was included as a comparable after considering foreign exchange gains and functional similarities.
- Jindal Intellicom Pvt. Ltd.: This company passed all filters and was found functionally similar to the assessee, hence included as a comparable.
- E4E Healthcare Services Ltd.: The inclusion of this comparable was not pressed by the assessee during the hearing.

2. Exclusion of Comparables:
- E-Clerx Services Ltd.: The Tribunal allowed the exclusion of E-Clerx Services Ltd. as it was found to be functionally dissimilar to the assessee, despite being initially included by the assessee in the study report. The Tribunal cited previous decisions and High Court rulings to support this exclusion.

3. Legal Precedents:
- The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mckinsey Knowledge Centre India (P) Ltd. to counter arguments by the Revenue, highlighting subsequent clarifications made by the High Court.

4. Conclusion:
The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to include R Systems International Ltd., CG VAK Software and Exports Pvt. Ltd., and Jindal Intellicom Pvt. Ltd. as comparables while excluding E-Clerx Services Ltd. The inclusion of these comparables would ensure that the assessee's pricing with associated enterprises remains within the tolerance band of +/-5%, meeting arm's length requirements. As a result, the cross objections raised by the assessee were partly allowed, rendering the adjudication of the Revenue appeal as academic and hence dismissed as infructuous.

---