Court Resolves Dispute Over Section 148A(d) Order, Directs Revenue to Share Info for 2018-19 Tax Assessment The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the notice under Section 148 for the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court Resolves Dispute Over Section 148A(d) Order, Directs Revenue to Share Info for 2018-19 Tax Assessment
The HC disposed of the writ petition challenging the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the notice under Section 148 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The Court directed the respondent-revenue to provide the petitioner with the incriminating material/information within four weeks. The petitioner was granted the liberty to present all contentions and submissions before the Assessing Officer. The Court noted the petitioner's delayed request for information and emphasized the need for timely action. All pending applications were also disposed of with these directions.
Issues: Challenging order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and consequential notice issued under Section 148 for the Assessment Year 2018-19.
Analysis:
1. The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the consequential notice issued under Section 148 for the Assessment Year 2018-19. The petitioner's counsel argued that a prayer for adjournment was filed against the notice, requesting further time for filing a reply. The reply was submitted via email on 30th March, 2022, as the online submission portal was closed by the Respondent. However, an ex-parte order was passed without considering the response, leading to a miscarriage of justice.
2. Upon reviewing the reply filed by the petitioner on 30th March, 2022, it was noted that the petitioner had only requested to be served with the information/documents in possession of the respondent-revenue without providing a reply on merits. The Court expressed the view that if the petitioner required the information/documents, they should have requested it earlier and not waited for seven months to approach the Court.
3. The Court acknowledged that the matter had progressed to the Section 148 stage and disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent-revenue to provide the incriminating material/information against the petitioner within four weeks. The petitioner was granted the liberty to present all contentions and submissions before the Assessing Officer.
4. Finally, the Court disposed of the present writ petition and pending applications with the aforementioned direction and liberty granted to the petitioner.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.