Company Petition Dismissed Due to Genuine Dispute

The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor, citing a genuine pre-existing dispute between the parties. Emphasizing the inappropriateness of IBC for recovery in such cases, the Tribunal advised seeking remedies under other laws. The application was rejected based on the Supreme Court's stance on disputes under Section 9, with a certified copy of the order available upon request.

---

---

Issues:
Company Petition under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a Corporate Debtor.

Analysis & Findings:
The Operational Creditor filed a Company Petition seeking initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against the Corporate Debtor, claiming an amount of 1,92,93,421/- as on 18.03.2019, with interest. The Operational Creditor alleged non-payment and accumulation of dues since 2013, with the last payment made on 31.10.2016. The Operational Creditor sent a demand notice in February 2019, but no payment was received. The Operational Creditor argued for initiation of CIRP based on the outstanding amount.

The Corporate Debtor contended that there were pre-existing disputes, and the petition was filed with malicious intent to coerce payment. The Corporate Debtor claimed unsatisfactory services by the Operational Creditor, leading to termination of services in 2016. The Corporate Debtor disputed the claim amount, citing issues with service quality and contractual obligations.

The Tribunal analyzed the submissions and evidence presented by both parties. It noted that the Operational Creditor's claim was within the limitation period based on the last payment date. The Tribunal referred to a relevant NCLAT judgment regarding consideration of all invoices to determine the debt amount. The Tribunal found that a pre-existing dispute existed between the parties, as evidenced by email correspondences and settlement of a portion of the claimed amount by the Corporate Debtor.

Relying on the Supreme Court's judgment, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of rejecting an application under Section 9 if a pre-existing dispute exists. The Tribunal concluded that the Operational Creditor's application was dismissed as there was a genuine dispute between the parties, and the IBC was not to be used as a recovery mechanism. The Tribunal suggested pursuing the claim under other applicable laws. A certified copy of the order was to be issued upon request.

In summary, the Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition for initiation of CIRP against the Corporate Debtor due to the presence of a pre-existing dispute, highlighting the need to address such disputes outside the scope of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.

---