Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a case arising from an essentially civil dispute concerning rent and related rights and where connected proceedings were already pending before the NCLT, the petitioner should be protected from arrest during investigation.
Analysis: The dispute was found, prima facie, to be civil in nature and centred on rent for the period 2018 onwards, with parallel proceedings already pending before the NCLT under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The Court left the question of maintainability of the NCLT proceedings to be raised before that forum and observed that the extent of criminality, if any, would depend on investigation. In these circumstances, while investigation was permitted to continue and the petitioner was required to cooperate and appear before the investigating officer, the Court also directed that arrest would not be made at that stage. The investigating officer was further directed to consider whether the petitioner's statement could be recorded through video conferencing if feasible.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted interim protection from arrest, subject to cooperation with the investigation, while the FIR investigation continued.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the dispute giving rise to criminal allegations is prima facie civil in character and the connected subject matter is already under adjudication before the appropriate statutory forum, arrest during investigation may be restrained subject to the accused's cooperation.