Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
Invalid Assessment Order Quashed for Lack of Opportunity for Hearing The Court held that the assessment order passed by the Respondent under section 143(3) read with section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was invalid due ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Invalid Assessment Order Quashed for Lack of Opportunity for Hearing
The Court held that the assessment order passed by the Respondent under section 143(3) read with section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was invalid due to a breach of the mandatory provision of section 144B(1) (xvi) as it was done without providing an opportunity for a personal hearing. The Court emphasized the importance of following procedural requirements and upholding principles of natural justice, ultimately quashing the assessment order and directing the Revenue to conduct the assessment in accordance with the prescribed procedure under section 144B.
Issues: 1. Breach of mandatory provision of section 144B(1) (xvi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Violation of principles of natural justice in passing the impugned order without affording an opportunity of personal hearing.
Issue 1: Breach of mandatory provision of section 144B(1) (xvi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The petitioner filed a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the assessment order passed by the Respondent under section 143(3) read with section 254 of the Act, 1961. The petitioner contended that there was a breach of mandatory provision of section 144B(1) (xvi) of the Act, 1961 as the impugned order was passed without serving any draft assessment order as prescribed. The petitioner argued that this breach alone warranted quashing the order. The respondent opposed the petition, stating that after examining the explanations, the order was valid. The Court analyzed section 144B which mandates a faceless assessment procedure and concluded that the impugned order was passed without providing an opportunity of personal hearing, violating principles of natural justice. The Court held that the order was passed in violation of the prescribed procedure under section 144B, necessitating its quashing.
Issue 2: Violation of principles of natural justice in passing the impugned order without affording an opportunity of personal hearing:
The Court examined the provisions of section 144B of the Act, 1961, which outline the procedure for Faceless Assessment introduced with effect from 1st April, 2021. Section 144B(1) mandates assessments to be made in a faceless manner, with detailed steps for providing opportunities to the assessee for response and personal hearing through video conferencing. The Court noted that in the present case, no draft assessment order with a show cause notice was given to the petitioner, depriving them of the chance to explain proposed additions. As per section 144B(7), the assessee is entitled to request a personal hearing in case of proposed variations prejudicial to them. The Court concluded that the impugned order was passed without following the prescribed procedure, violating principles of natural justice. Consequently, the Court allowed the petition, quashed the assessment order, and directed the Revenue to proceed with assessment under section 144B after issuing a show cause notice-cum-draft assessment order to provide the petitioner with an opportunity of hearing as per the Act.
The Court's decision highlighted the importance of adhering to procedural requirements in assessments to ensure fairness and uphold principles of natural justice.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.