Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI • Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions • Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations • Issue-wise legal analysis • Practical arguments and supporting content • Professionally structured draft ready for further review.
High Court grants interim relief, directs filing of annexures, counters, and schedules proceedings. The High Court allowed the applications filed by the petitioners seeking interim relief from separate adjudication orders arising from a single show-cause ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court grants interim relief, directs filing of annexures, counters, and schedules proceedings.
The High Court allowed the applications filed by the petitioners seeking interim relief from separate adjudication orders arising from a single show-cause notice. The Court directed the petitioners to file legible copies of annexures before the next hearing date. It acknowledged the issue of two separate adjudication orders stemming from one notice and issued notice to the respondents. The Court directed the filing of a counter-affidavit within four weeks and scheduled further proceedings. It also ordered no coercive measures against the petitioners during the interim period.
Issues involved: Petitioners seeking interim relief due to separate adjudication orders arising from a single show-cause notice.
Analysis: The High Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju, heard the matter involving Mr. Rakesh Prasad Singh, Advocate as the Petitioner and Mr. Anurag Ojha, Sr. Standing Counsel for the Respondents. The Court allowed the applications filed by the petitioners subject to filing legible copies of annexures three days before the next hearing date in W.P.(C) 10390/2022 and W.P.(C) 10403/2022. The principal grievance raised by the petitioners was the issuance of two separate adjudication orders on different dates, 14.02.2022 and 26.03.2022, stemming from a single show-cause notice dated 22.05.2019. The Court acknowledged the correctness of this assertion on the face of it.
Mr. Anurag Ojha, representing the respondents, informed the Court that he needed to seek instructions and would return. Consequently, the Court issued notice on the issue. Mr. Ojha accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents. The Court directed the filing of a counter-affidavit within the next four weeks, with any rejoinder to be filed before the subsequent hearing. The matters were listed for further proceedings on 05.09.2022. Additionally, the Court ordered that no coercive measures should be taken against the petitioners in connection with the aforementioned adjudication orders during the interim period.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI Drafter ✕
TaxTMI 
