Appeal Dismissed: Deduction Disallowed for M/s. PRIA CETP (India) Ltd.

The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of deduction under section 80-IA for the appellant, M/s. PRIA CETP (India) Ltd., for the assessment year 2012-13. Despite the appellant's appeal to the Ld. CIT(A), and subsequently to the Tribunal, the failure to provide new evidence or appear during proceedings led to the dismissal of the appeal. The Tribunal found that the appellant's agreement with Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation did not meet the requirements of section 80IA(4) for the claimed deduction, resulting in the affirmation of the initial disallowance decision.

---

---

Issues: Disallowance of deduction u/s 80-IA

In this case, the appellant, M/s. PRIA CETP (India) Ltd., sought to set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) confirming the disallowance of deduction under section 80-IA amounting to Rs. 2,78,29,293 for the assessment year 2012-13. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee under section 80IA(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and framed the assessment at a total income of Rs. 37,80,71,14. The assessee appealed to the Ld. CIT(A), who partly allowed the appeal. However, the assessee further appealed to the Tribunal, but despite notice, no one appeared on behalf of the company during the proceedings. The Tribunal decided the appeal based on the available record and the arguments presented by the Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue.

The Tribunal noted that the assessee's claim for deduction under section 80IA for the water treatment system plant started in June 2004. It was observed that the assessee's claims for deduction under section 80IA for the preceding years had not been accepted. The Tribunal analyzed the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) and found that the agreement with Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) and the memorandum of understanding did not fulfill the basic requirements of section 80IA(4) of the Act for the claim under section 80IA. Since no new facts or evidence were presented by the assessee, and they did not appear before the Tribunal, the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) was upheld, and the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed.

---