Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether nylon twine manufactured by the petitioners was classifiable as nylon yarn under Item No. 18 of the First Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, or under Tariff Item No. 68.
Analysis: The issue was treated as concluded by an earlier Division Bench decision which had held that nylon twine is covered by Item No. 18. The petitioners' manufacturing process, resulting in flat yarns by doubling and twisting into fishnet twine, was found to fall within that classification. The contrary contention that the goods belonged to Tariff Item No. 68 had already been negatived by the binding precedent.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be classifiable under Item No. 18, not Tariff Item No. 68, and the petition was allowed.