TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Recovering Compensation from Deceased Accused's Estate: Legal Implications</h1> <h3>INDRANIL MUKHERJEE Versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS</h3> INDRANIL MUKHERJEE Versus THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND OTHERS - TMI Issues Involved:1. Whether the compensation awarded under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be recovered from the estate of a deceased accused.2. Whether an interim compensation awarded under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be recovered from the estate of a deceased accused who died before the conclusion of the trial.Detailed Analysis:Issue 1: Recovery of Compensation under Section 138 from the Estate of a Deceased AccusedThe court examined the applicability of Section 421 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and Section 70 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, in the context of recovering fines and compensation from the estate of a deceased accused. Section 70 of the IPC states, 'The death of the offender does not discharge from the liability any property which would, after his death, be legally liable for his debts.' This provision, along with Section 25 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, which extends the applicability of Sections 63 to 70 of the IPC to fines imposed under any Act, including the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, supports the recovery of compensation from the deceased's estate.The court referenced the Supreme Court's decision in Bondada Gajapathi Rao v. State of A.P., which held that legal representatives could continue proceedings if the sentence affects the property. The court concluded that compensation awarded under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, could be recovered from the estate of a deceased accused, as the liability persists posthumously.Issue 2: Recovery of Interim Compensation under Section 143A from the Estate of a Deceased AccusedThe court analyzed Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which allows for interim compensation during the trial process. Section 143A(4) specifies that if the drawer of the cheque is acquitted, the interim compensation must be repaid with interest. This provision implies that interim compensation is contingent upon the trial's outcome and does not confer a permanent right to the complainant.The court noted that the interim compensation order is dependent on the trial's conclusion and lacks finality. Since the trial cannot adjudicate the accused's guilt or innocence posthumously, the interim compensation order ceases to exist upon the accused's death. Therefore, interim compensation awarded under Section 143A cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased accused who died before the trial's conclusion.The court dismissed the revisional application, affirming the lower court's order that interim compensation could not be executed against the deceased's estate. The court emphasized that the statutory provisions and judicial precedents support this interpretation, ensuring that interim compensation remains provisional and contingent on the trial's outcome.Conclusion:The court concluded that while compensation awarded under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, can be recovered from the estate of a deceased accused, interim compensation awarded under Section 143A cannot be recovered if the accused dies before the trial concludes. The revisional application was dismissed, upholding the lower court's decision.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
