TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the return of the second revision papers was liable to be entertained despite the delay and whether the revisional authority could condone the belated filing under Section 57 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.
Analysis: The petitioner's goods had been detained on the ground that they were moved to an unregistered place of business and were released only after payment of compounding fee. The second revision before the first respondent was filed beyond the prescribed period under Section 57 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006. The Court noted that the first respondent had no power to condone the delay in filing the second revision and had therefore returned the revision papers. The writ petition itself was filed after about two years from the impugned action, and no satisfactory explanation for the delay was offered. In these circumstances, the challenge was held to suffer from delay and laches.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not maintainable on account of unexplained delay and laches, and the return of the revision papers was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The challenge failed, and the impugned action remained undisturbed because the matter was barred by delay and the revisional filing was beyond time.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory revision is filed beyond limitation and the authority lacks power to condone delay, a belated writ challenge to the consequential return of the revision papers can be rejected for delay and laches.
TaxTMI 
