Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the dismissal of the appeal for failure to cure the defects of non-payment of additional court fee and non-furnishing of a certified copy of the impugned order was liable to be set aside and the appeal restored.
Analysis: The appeal had been dismissed for failure to rectify defects noticed by the appellate authority, namely, remittance of the additional court fee and production of a certified copy of the order appealed against. The Court found that the authority had taken a hyper-technical approach and that, in the prevailing circumstances, a more liberal view was warranted. It held that interests of justice required one further opportunity to cure the defects, particularly having regard to the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and the need to preserve access to justice.
Conclusion: The dismissal of the appeal was set aside and the appeal was directed to be restored on condition that the defects be cured within the time granted.