Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order was vitiated for failure to afford the petitioner a personal hearing after receipt of the reply to the proposition notice.
Analysis: The reassessment was made under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2013. Prior opportunities during the pre-show-cause stage did not eliminate the petitioner's entitlement to seek a personal hearing after issuance of the proposition notice. Since the petitioner had specifically requested a hearing in the reply and the order was passed without granting it, the requirement of fair procedure was not satisfied.
Conclusion: The reassessment order was held to be in breach of the principles of natural justice and was set aside. The matter was remanded for reconsideration from the stage of receipt of the reply to the proposition notice, with an opportunity of personal hearing.