Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioners were entitled to exemption from customs duty and additional duty on the imported stainless steel ingots/billets, and whether promissory estoppel could be invoked despite the withdrawal of the exemption before the goods arrived at the port.
Analysis: The exemption notifications issued under Section 25(1) of the Customs Act applied only up to 31 March 1982 and had been withdrawn on 28 February 1982. The goods reached Bombay on 13 April 1982, when the exemption was no longer in force. Since liability to duty arose on the date of arrival, the petitioners could not rely on the earlier notifications or on promissory estoppel to avoid duty.
Conclusion: The petitioners were not entitled to exemption, and the levy of customs duty and additional duty was upheld.