Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte assessment order and the accompanying summary order were vitiated for breach of natural justice and absence of reasons, warranting quashing and remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The order was passed ex parte in proceedings under Section 73(1) of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Rule 142(5) of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017. It was found that no sufficient opportunity of hearing had been afforded and that the order did not disclose adequate reasons to explain how the tax liability had been determined. Since the order entailed civil consequences and suffered from violation of the principles of natural justice, interference was held to be justified notwithstanding the availability of statutory remedy.
Conclusion: The ex parte order and the summary order were set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision on merits after affording adequate opportunity of hearing and passing a speaking order.
Ratio Decidendi: An ex parte fiscal order having civil consequences, if passed without adequate hearing and without reasons, is liable to be quashed and sent back for fresh consideration in compliance with natural justice.