Limited review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC requires an error apparent on the record; unsupported review grounds fail.

Review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC is narrow and can be exercised only on recognised grounds, such as an error apparent on the face of the record. The Court found that no such ground was demonstrated and that the asserted exception based on a departmental circular did not establish a valid basis for review. The review petitions were therefore held to be without merit and were dismissed, bringing the proceedings to an end against the review petitioner.

---

---

Issues: Whether the review petitions disclosed any ground warranting exercise of review jurisdiction under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Analysis: Review jurisdiction is limited and can be exercised only when the matter falls within the narrow parameters akin to Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. No error apparent on the face of the record or other material satisfying the requirements of review was shown, and the asserted exception based on the departmental circular was not established as a valid basis for review.

Conclusion: The ground for review was not made out, and the review petitions were liable to be dismissed.

Final Conclusion: The Court declined interference in review and brought the proceedings to an end against the review petitioner.

Ratio Decidendi: Review jurisdiction cannot be invoked unless a legally recognised ground, such as an error apparent on the face of the record, is demonstrably shown.

---