Right to summon seizure witnesses in Gold Control adjudication ensures full and effective defence.

Section 63 of the Gold (Control) Act empowers a Gold Control Officer of gazetted rank to summon any person whose evidence or documents are considered necessary, and the provision is designed to ensure adjudication proceeds on evidence while giving the person from whom gold was seized a full and effective opportunity of defence. On that basis, the authority should have summoned the witnesses named by the petitioner, as there was no refusal based on their being unnecessary. The petitioner was therefore entitled to have those witnesses summoned and examined in the adjudication proceedings.

---

---

Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to have the witnesses to the seizure summoned and examined in the adjudication proceedings under Section 63 of the Gold (Control) Act.

Analysis: Section 63 empowers the Gold Control Officer of gazetted rank to summon any person whose attendance is considered necessary to give evidence or produce documents. The provision is intended to ensure that adjudication proceeds on evidence and that the person from whom gold was seized is afforded a full and effective opportunity of defence. In the absence of any refusal on the footing that the requested witnesses were unnecessary, the authority ought to have summoned the witnesses named by the petitioner.

Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to have the witnesses summoned and examined, and the direction was issued accordingly.

---