Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2021 (11) TMI 208 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessing Officer's Additions Without Jurisdiction: Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act were without jurisdiction as they lacked ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Assessing Officer's Additions Without Jurisdiction: Tribunal Rules in Favor of Assessee

                            The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act were without jurisdiction as they lacked incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the assessee's cross-objection was allowed, and the Revenue's appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal's decision applied to the assessment year 2012-13 as well.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act in the absence of incriminating material.
                            2. Validity of additions made based on statements recorded during search and survey operations.
                            3. Whether statements recorded during search constitute "incriminating material."
                            4. Applicability of Section 68 and Section 69C of the Income Tax Act concerning the additions made.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act in the absence of incriminating material:
                            The assessee contested the addition of Rs. 38,98,15,150 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 153A, arguing that the addition was made without any incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal noted that the assessment for the year under consideration (A.Y. 2011-12) was already completed under Section 143(3) before the search. Therefore, any addition under Section 153A should be based solely on incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that the purpose of Section 153A is to assess undisclosed income discovered during the search, not to reassess completed assessments without new incriminating evidence.

                            2. Validity of additions made based on statements recorded during search and survey operations:
                            The AO relied heavily on statements recorded during the search and survey operations, including those of various third parties and alleged entry operators, to justify the additions. The Tribunal observed that these statements alone, without any corroborative material, do not constitute incriminating evidence sufficient to justify additions under Section 153A. The Tribunal referred to several judicial precedents, including CIT v. Harjeev Aggarwal and CIT v. Best Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, which held that statements recorded during search or survey do not, by themselves, constitute incriminating material.

                            3. Whether statements recorded during search constitute "incriminating material":
                            The Tribunal held that statements recorded during the search or survey cannot be considered incriminating material unless they are corroborated by other evidence found during the search. The Tribunal cited the case of CIT v. Harjeev Aggarwal, where it was held that statements recorded under Section 132(4) can be used as evidence only if they relate to incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal also noted that statements recorded during the survey under Section 133A do not have evidentiary value, as held by the Supreme Court in CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son.

                            4. Applicability of Section 68 and Section 69C of the Income Tax Act concerning the additions made:
                            The AO made additions under Section 68 for unexplained cash credits and under Section 69C for unexplained expenditure based on loans and advances received by the assessee from certain companies alleged to be paper entities. The Tribunal found that these transactions were duly recorded in the regular books of account and could not be construed as incriminating material. The Tribunal reiterated that additions under Section 153A for unabated years must be based on incriminating material found during the search, which was not the case here.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal concluded that the additions made by the AO under Section 153A were without jurisdiction as they were not based on any incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the cross-objection filed by the assessee was allowed, and the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed. The Tribunal's decision applied mutatis mutandis to the assessment year 2012-13, which was also an unabated year.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found