Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Select multiple courts at once.
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal dismissed: Partner's sole statement cannot justify firm tax additions; independent corroborative evidence required under tax law</h1> The SC dismissed the appeal and upheld the HC's decision that additions to the assessment of a firm, made solely on the basis of a statement by any ... Concurrent findings of factConcurrent findings of fact - The civil appeal filed by the Department was dismissed on account of concurrent findings of fact. - HELD THAT: - The Court heard learned counsel for both parties and granted leave to appeal. Having considered the matter, the Supreme Court found that the questions raised were governed by concurrent findings of fact returned by the courts below. In view of those concurrent factual findings, the Court concluded that the appeal did not warrant interference and accordingly dismissed the appeal.Civil appeal dismissed in view of concurrent findings of fact; no order as to costs.Final Conclusion: The Department's civil appeal for assessment year 2001-2002 is dismissed by the Supreme Court on the basis of concurrent findings of fact; no order as to costs. The Supreme Court dismissed a civil appeal filed by the Department for the assessment year 2001-2002 due to concurrent findings of fact. No costs were awarded. (Case citation: 2013 (6) TMI 305 - SC)