<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (11) TMI 208 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414427</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act were without jurisdiction as they lacked incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision applied to the assessment year 2012-13 as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2021 07:00:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=660432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (11) TMI 208 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414427</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act were without jurisdiction as they lacked incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s cross-objection was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed. The Tribunal&#039;s decision applied to the assessment year 2012-13 as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=414427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>