TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Requires Respondents to Address Petitioner's Claims Promptly</h1> <h3>M/s. Ankush Auto Deals Versus Commissioner of DGST & Anr.</h3> M/s. Ankush Auto Deals Versus Commissioner of DGST & Anr. - TMI Issues:Petition seeking refund of SGST and CGST with interest and damages for delay in refund issuance.Analysis:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking directions for the refund of SGST and CGST totaling Rs. 25,29,944 along with interest and damages due to the delay in refund issuance. The petitioner argued that as per Section 54(7) of the GST Act, the proper officer must issue the refund order within sixty days of receiving a complete refund application. Additionally, any delay in processing the refund without valid reasons would attract interest as per Section 56 of the DGST/CGST Act. Despite reminders and requests, the petitioner did not receive any response from the respondents. The petitioner relied on a previous court order in support of their contention.The court issued notice to the respondents, who accepted it and undertook to dispose of the petitioner's representations within three weeks. The court accepted the undertaking and held the respondents bound by it. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, with the matter listed for compliance on a specified date. The court ordered the uploaded judgment on the website and forwarded a copy to the petitioner's counsel via email.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
