Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained when, in a faceless assessment under section 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the assessee was not given an opportunity to show cause against a proposed variation prejudicial to its interest.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) requires the National Faceless Assessment Centre to afford the assessee an opportunity to show cause where a variation prejudicial to the assessee is proposed. Section 144B(7)(vii) also contemplates a request for personal hearing after such notice. Since the impugned assessment order under section 143(3) was made without granting the requisite opportunity on the proposed variation, the assessment suffered from breach of the statutory procedure.
Conclusion: The impugned assessment order was set aside for failure to grant the mandatory opportunity to show cause on the proposed variation, and the assessee was directed to file objections for fresh completion of assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: In faceless assessment, an assessment order made without the mandatory statutory opportunity to show cause against a prejudicial variation is unsustainable and liable to be set aside.