2021 (9) TMI 1015 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal Cancels Penalty for Non-Compliance with Tax Notice

The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act on the assessee for non-compliance of a statutory notice. The ... Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - default of non-compliance of the statutory notice issued under section 142(1) r.w.s. 129 - proof of any deliberate attempt on the part of the assessee - non compliance of particular notice on technical grounds - HELD THAT:- There is no deliberate attempt on the part of the assessee, more so when the time given by the ld.AO to the assessee for compliance was very short. Further, assessment under section 143(3) was finalized by accepting the returned income filed by the assessee. The assessee might have missed to make compliance on those dates but ultimately due compliance was made and requisite details were filed by the assessee and had participated in the proceedings before the AO and the assessment has been completed u/s 143(3), and therefore, penalty should not be levied u/s 271(1(b) of the Act for non compliance of particular notice merely on technical grounds. Various Benches of the Tribunal in a number of decisions have held that where the assessment order was finally passed u/s 143(3) and not u/s 144 of the Act due to subsequent compliance during the assessment proceedings, that would be considered as good compliance and the defaults committed earlier should be ignored and by taking a lenient view the penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of the I.T. Act 1961 should not be levied - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues:Appeal against order under section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for non-compliance of statutory notice.Detailed Analysis:1. Issue of Non-Compliance Penalty:The assessee appealed against the order confirming the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) for alleged non-compliance of a statutory notice. The AO initiated penalty proceedings due to the non-compliance of a notice issued under section 142(1) dated 18.9.2017. The assessee argued that despite cooperating during the assessment proceedings, the time given for compliance with the notice was insufficient. The AO imposed a penalty of Rs. 10,000 under section 271(1)(b) due to the non-compliance. The assessee contended that the administrative staff was occupied with tax audit report requirements, making it challenging to comply within the short notice period.2. Assessee's Submission and AO's Assessment:The assessee demonstrated a detailed chart showing the issuance of notices and the time provided for compliance. It was highlighted that the assessment was completed under section 143(3) with the assessee's cooperation evident from the assessment order itself. The AO acknowledged the cooperation of the assessee during the assessment proceedings. The assessee argued that the penalty under section 271(1)(b) was unwarranted as there was no deliberate non-compliance, and compliance was eventually achieved during the assessment process.3. Tribunal's Decision and Legal Interpretation:The Tribunal considered the submissions of both parties and reviewed the orders of the Revenue authorities. It noted that the assessment was finalized under section 143(3) with the assessee's full cooperation. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had reasonable grounds for the non-compliance of the notice, especially considering the short time provided for compliance. Referring to previous Tribunal decisions, it was established that subsequent compliance during assessment proceedings, leading to finalization under section 143(3), should be considered as good compliance. The Tribunal concluded that the penalty under section 271(1)(b) should not be imposed merely on technical grounds, especially when the assessee eventually complied with the requirements.4. Final Verdict and Outcome:The Tribunal set aside the order of the ld.CIT(A) and canceled the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(b) on the assessee. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, emphasizing that the reasonable causes for non-compliance warranted a lenient view, especially considering the subsequent compliance and cooperation during the assessment process. The decision was pronounced in court on 2nd July 2021.