Interim bail in money-laundering case granted on custody, health, surrender, and parity factors with strict conditions.

Interim bail was granted in a money-laundering prosecution after the court considered prolonged custody, the petitioner's medical condition, voluntary surrender, and the fact that co-accused had already been enlarged on bail. The court did not enter into the merits of the allegations and instead treated these factors as sufficient for temporary relief. Bail was allowed for one month subject to stringent conditions, including reporting obligations and restrictions designed to secure the petitioner's availability and prevent interference with the investigation or witnesses.

---

---

Issues: Whether interim bail should be granted to the petitioner in connection with the money-laundering prosecution, having regard to the length of custody, health condition, prior surrender, and the fact that co-accused were already on bail.

Analysis: The application was considered without entering into the merits of the allegations. Relevant factors included the petitioner's prolonged incarceration, his voluntary surrender before the court, the fact that other accused had already been enlarged on bail, and his medical condition. On that basis, the Court found it appropriate to grant temporary relief by way of interim bail, subject to stringent conditions to ensure availability and prevent interference with the investigation or witnesses.

Conclusion: Interim bail was granted for one month on specified conditions, and the petitioner was directed to comply with reporting and non-interference requirements.

---