ITAT rules on disallowances in ITA No. 2210/Del/2018

The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee in ITA No. 2210/Del/2018. It held that disallowance under section 14A should only consider investments yielding exempt income. The ITAT also upheld the deletion of expenses disallowance on income from syndication services and software expenses, emphasizing the integral nature of software with computer equipment. Additionally, it confirmed the disallowance of specific legal and professional expenses as capital expenses, while treating consultancy charges for specific projects as revenue expenditure. The ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
2. Disallowance of expenses on account of sale of content.
3. Disallowance and depreciation claim of software expenses.
4. Legal and professional expenses disallowance.

Issue 1: Disallowance under section 14A:
The Assessing Officer (AO) computed a disallowance under section 14A based on Rule 8D(2)(ii), which was contested by the appellant. The ITAT directed that only investments yielding exempt income should be considered for disallowance, citing the decision in CIT Vs Vireet Investments Pvt. Ltd.

Issue 2: Disallowance of expenses on account of sale of content:
The ITAT upheld the deletion of the disallowance of expenses related to income from syndication services, based on previous favorable decisions for the assessee by the Delhi High Court.

Issue 3: Disallowance and depreciation claim of software expenses:
The AO disallowed a portion of software expenses and reduced the depreciation claim on software. The ITAT upheld the deletion of the disallowance based on previous decisions favoring the assessee and the integral nature of software with computer equipment.

Issue 4: Legal and professional expenses disallowance:
The AO disallowed certain expenses related to shares subscription and due diligence reports. The ITAT reviewed each expenditure item and upheld the disallowance of specific amounts as capital expenses. The ITAT also confirmed that certain expenses were in the nature of capital expenditure, as per details provided.

Judgment for ITA No. 2210/Del/2018 (Assessee):
The ITAT referred to Section 35DD of the Income Tax Act regarding amortization of expenditure in case of amalgamation or demerger. It held that the expenditure related to valuation of shares for merger should be treated in accordance with Section 35DD. The ITAT also determined that consultancy charges for specific projects should be treated as revenue expenditure, not capital, as they were related to the development of new products and enhancement of existing features on the website.

In conclusion, the ITAT dismissed the revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes in the judgment. The detailed analysis of each issue involved in the case provides a comprehensive understanding of the ITAT's decision and the legal principles applied in the context of the Income Tax Act.

---