Court denies bail cancellation, orders respondent to cooperate with investigation, petitioner can seek relief if conditions unmet.

The Court declined to cancel the respondent's bail, noting the respondent's willingness to cooperate with the investigation despite allegations of non-cooperation. The Court directed the respondent to continue cooperating with the Investigating Officer and appear for further proceedings when summoned. The petitioner was granted the liberty to approach the Court again if the respondent failed to comply with the conditions outlined by the Court.

---

---

Issues:
1. Petition to cancel bail granted to the respondent.
2. Allegations of non-cooperation by the respondent during the investigation.
3. Request for cancellation/recall of anticipatory bail.
4. Response of the respondent regarding cooperation with the Investigating Officer.
5. Decision of the Court regarding the petition.

Analysis:
1. The petitioner sought to cancel the bail granted to the respondent, alleging non-cooperation during the investigation. The petitioner argued that the respondent failed to comply with the condition of cooperating with the Investigating Officer and was attempting to erase evidence related to the alleged offense of fraud in GST payment. The petitioner requested the cancellation or recall of the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent.

2. In response, the respondent's counsel contended that the respondent was willing to cooperate with the Investigating Officer and had no intention to hinder the investigation. The respondent expressed readiness to appear before the Investigating Officer for further proceedings, despite having lodged a complaint against the Investigating Officer due to alleged ill-treatment.

3. The Court considered the submissions from both parties and noted the respondent's willingness to cooperate with the investigation. Consequently, the Court found no grounds to entertain the petition seeking the cancellation of bail. However, the Court recorded the respondent's commitment to cooperate with the Investigating Officer and directed the respondent to appear for investigation when summoned.

4. The Court disposed of the petition, granting the petitioner the liberty to approach the Court again if the respondent violated any of the conditions mentioned in the order. This provision allowed the petitioner to seek redress in case of non-compliance by the respondent with the conditions set forth by the Court regarding cooperation with the Investigating Officer and the investigation process.

---