Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment and appellate orders passed under Section 74 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were liable to be set aside for violation of the principles of natural justice and absence of adequate reasons.
Analysis: The impugned orders were passed in an ex parte manner. No sufficient opportunity of hearing was afforded to the assessee, and the orders did not disclose adequate reasons showing how the tax liability was determined. Since the orders entailed civil consequences, the lack of fair hearing and the absence of a speaking order rendered them unsustainable. The matter was therefore fit to be remitted for fresh adjudication after compliance with natural justice.
Conclusion: The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remanded to the Assessing Authority for fresh decision on merits after giving adequate opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An ex parte tax order passed without fair hearing and without reasons cannot be sustained when it results in civil consequences; such an order may be quashed and remitted for fresh adjudication.