Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to relief under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 when the payment under the issued statement was tendered within the extended time but was not accepted due to no fault of the petitioner.
Analysis: The petitioner had opted for settlement under the scheme, filed the declaration, and was issued the statement determining the amount payable. The payment was tendered within the extended period, but the amount was debited and then recredited, showing that the petitioner had made the attempt to comply within time. Since the material facts were not in dispute and the failure to complete the payment was not attributable to the petitioner, relief was considered appropriate.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held entitled to relief, and the writ petition was allowed in terms of prayer clause (c).