Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a petition for amalgamation under the Companies Act, 2013, the meetings of equity shareholders and creditors of the applicant companies were liable to be dispensed with on the basis of written consents and the absence of secured creditors.
Analysis: The application was supported by board approvals, the scheme of merger, valuation material, financial statements, and certificates showing the shareholding and creditor positions of the applicant companies. The equity shareholders had furnished affidavits consenting to the scheme and to waiver of meetings. The applicant companies had no secured creditors, and in respect of those applicant companies with no unsecured creditors, meetings were unnecessary. For the remaining unsecured creditors, written consents on affidavit were produced. The statutory notice requirements under section 230(5) and Rule 8 of the Companies (Compromises, Arrangements and Amalgamations) Rules, 2016 were also directed to be complied with.
Conclusion: The meetings of equity shareholders, secured creditors, and unsecured creditors, as applicable, were dispensed with.