TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petitioner's IGST reversal challenge clarified as intimation, response required within four weeks.</h1> <h3>M/s. SLT Cement Marketers Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Superintendent of GST and Central Excise, Chennai Outer Commissionerate Enforcement & Compliance Management Section, Chennai</h3> The petitioner's challenge against a communication for the reversal of IGST amounting to Rs. 3,53,620 was clarified by the respondent as an intimation and ... Validity of notice - Non-Service of SCN - Reversal of IGST - communication amounts to a demand in respect of which there has been no proper show cause notice or notice of any sort - HELD THAT:- The respondent has filed a counter wherein at paragraph 5 he states that the impugned communication is only an intimation of IGST payable and consequentially, a request to the petitioner to reverse the same. If that were so, then the impugned intimation shall be construed to put the petitioner to notice as to the proposal to reverse the same. The petitioner will file a reply to the same within a period of four weeks from today and further proceedings may be taken thereafter in accordance with law - Petition closed. The petitioner challenged a communication dated 17.08.2020 regarding the reversal of IGST amounting to Rs. 3,53,620. The respondent clarified that it was only an intimation and a request to reverse the amount. The petitioner is to reply within four weeks, and further proceedings will follow as per the law. The writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition are closed with no costs.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
