Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicants, who were not shown to be principal officers of the company, were entitled to interim anticipatory bail in a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
Analysis: The application arose from allegations of large-scale tax evasion against the company. The applicants were described as brokers or agents, and not as the principal officers of the company. It was also noted that the directors of the company had already been granted interim anticipatory bail. On that footing, the Court found that the applicants were, for the time being, entitled to similar interim protection.
Conclusion: Interim anticipatory bail was granted to the applicants till the next date of listing, subject to furnishing bond and sureties and compliance with the stated conditions.