Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 on the ground that investigation was incomplete and the complaint/final report was not filed within the statutory period.
Analysis: The application turned on whether the complaint filed on the expiry of the 60-day period could be treated as a complaint arising from the same investigation file and whether it amounted to completion of investigation for the purpose of Section 167(2). The record showed that the applicant was arrested on 12.11.2020, remanded on 13.11.2020, and the statutory period expired on 11.01.2021. The complaint/final report was filed before the Court on the same day, 11.01.2021. The Court accepted the respondent's position that the complaint was filed in continuation of and after culmination of the very same investigation, and held that the absence of an explicit recital in the complaint did not make it incomplete or unrelated to the earlier investigation file.
Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the application was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: When a complaint or final report is filed within the statutory period and is demonstrably referable to the same completed investigation, the right to default bail under Section 167(2) does not arise merely because the complaint does not expressly recite completion of investigation.