Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the applicant, in custody in a case involving alleged cheating and misappropriation, was entitled to bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: The application was considered in the light of the case diary, charge-sheet, statements of the complainants, and the bank material showing a prima facie deposit of Rs. 17,00,000/- in the applicant's account. The Court also noted that the co-accused had already been granted bail, investigation was complete, the charge-sheet had been filed, the applicant had no criminal past, and the trial was likely to take time. These circumstances were treated as sufficient to exclude a substantial risk of absconding or tampering with evidence, while also justifying the imposition of monetary and other conditions.
Conclusion: Bail was granted to the applicant, subject to deposit of Rs. 17,00,000/- in instalments and compliance with the prescribed bail bond and surety conditions.
Final Conclusion: The applicant was released on bail with strict monetary, surety, and statutory compliance conditions attached to the order.
Ratio Decidendi: Where investigation is complete, the charge-sheet is filed, the accused has no criminal antecedents, and the record discloses limited risk of absconding or interference with evidence, bail may be granted under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 subject to appropriate conditions.