Court invalidates confiscation, grants access to documents, directs new inquiry in import license dispute

The High Court found in favor of the petitioner due to a breach of natural justice in passing impugned orders related to an import license dispute. The Court invalidated the confiscation of dates, overturned the rejection of the appeal, and directed a fresh inquiry by the authority. The petitioner was granted access to the relevant telegram and allowed to inspect the original document. The fine and duty paid by the petitioner were to be retained pending the conclusion of the new inquiry.

---

---

Issues:
1. Interpretation of import license regarding the loading date of the consignment.
2. Breach of natural justice in passing the impugned orders.

Detailed Analysis:
1. The petitioner, an importer with a valid import license for dates from Basra to Bombay, claimed that the consignment was loaded within the license period. However, the authorities alleged that the consignment was loaded after the license expiry based on a telegram from the vessel's Tindal. The petitioner was not given a chance to respond to this telegram before the impugned order was passed, violating principles of natural justice.

2. The High Court held that the impugned orders confiscating the dates and rejecting the appeal were invalid due to the breach of natural justice. The Court set aside the orders and allowed the petition, directing a fresh inquiry by the authority. The authority was instructed to provide the petitioner with the Tindal's telegram and statement, allowing inspection of the original telegram. The fine and duty paid by the petitioner were to be retained until the new inquiry's conclusion.

In conclusion, the Court found in favor of the petitioner due to the procedural irregularity and ordered a fresh inquiry while retaining the fine and duty paid by the petitioner.

---