Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether blowers manufactured without any electrical device fell within Item 33 of the Schedule to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, so as to attract excise duty, and whether duty already realised on such blowers was refundable.
Analysis: Item 33, as amended, referred to electrical fans and used the expression "those" in sub-item (2), which linked the provision to fans of an electrical character. On that construction, blowers without any electrical device or electrical operation were not covered by the amended sub-item (2). The provision could not be extended to impose duty on articles outside that description. However, the ruling distinguished between non-electrical blowers and blowers with electrical device, the latter remaining outside the refund relief.
Conclusion: Blowers without any electrical device were not chargeable to excise duty under Item 33, and any duty realised on such blowers was refundable. No refund was available for blowers with electrical device or electrically operated blowers.