Court Orders Release of Seized Trucks under GST Act with Conditions

The court ordered the release of two seized trucks owned by the writ applicant under Section 129 of the GST Act, subject to specified conditions. It did not interfere with the ongoing inquiry but directed the respondent to release the trucks for the purpose of the investigation. The court emphasized the importance of cooperation from the writ applicant in the inquiry process and granted a stay on further proceedings, prohibiting coercive actions against the petitioner. The judgment underscored the need for both parties to cooperate in the investigation, leaving the department responsible for conducting a lawful inquiry.

---

---

Issues:
1. Seizure of trucks under Section 129 of the GST Act
2. Legality of the initiation of search proceedings
3. Issuance of summons under Section 70 of the GST Act
4. Stay on further proceedings by the respondent authority
5. Coercive steps against the petitioner
6. Release of the seized trucks subject to conditions

Analysis:
1. The judgment dealt with the seizure of two trucks owned by the writ applicant under Section 129 of the GST Act. The trucks were seized based on past contraventions of the Act and Rules. An inquiry was initiated, and a summons under Section 70 of the Act was issued. The court considered whether the seizure was justified when the trucks were not carrying goods and were seized from the office premises. The court ordered the release of the trucks with certain conditions to be fulfilled by the writ applicant.

2. The legality of the initiation of search proceedings was questioned by the writ applicant. The court did not interfere with the ongoing inquiry but directed the respondent to release the trucks subject to conditions. The court emphasized that any incriminating evidence found during the inquiry could lead to further action under Section 130 of the Act. The court clarified that the release of trucks was for the purpose of the inquiry and that the department should continue its investigation in accordance with the law.

3. The issuance of summons under Section 70 of the GST Act was also addressed in the judgment. The court expected the writ applicant to cooperate with the investigation and appear before the appropriate authority for interrogation or recording of statements. The court stressed the importance of the writ applicant's cooperation in the investigation process.

4. The court granted a stay on further proceedings by the respondent authority and restrained them from taking coercive steps against the petitioner. The court's decision to release the trucks was aimed at ensuring the writ applicant's ability to use them in the normal course of business, subject to the conditions imposed.

5. The judgment concluded by emphasizing the importance of cooperation from both parties in the investigation process. The court highlighted that it had not delved into the legality and validity of the inquiry, reiterating that it was the department's responsibility to conduct a thorough investigation in accordance with the law.

---