Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2020 (12) TMI 1202 - NAPA - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Respondent failed to pass GST rate reduction on movie tickets, directed to deposit profiteered amount. The Respondent in the case failed to pass on the benefit of a GST rate reduction on movie admission tickets from 18% to 12%, as required by Section 171 of ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Respondent failed to pass GST rate reduction on movie tickets, directed to deposit profiteered amount.

                              The Respondent in the case failed to pass on the benefit of a GST rate reduction on movie admission tickets from 18% to 12%, as required by Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The investigation revealed that the Respondent increased ticket prices despite the rate reduction, resulting in a profiteered amount of Rs. 2,23,850/-. The Respondent was directed to deposit this amount with interest into specified welfare funds within three months. Failure to comply would lead to recovery by the Commissioner CGST and SGST. The Order emphasized the importance of complying with the statutory provisions and monitoring by the relevant authorities.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Alleged profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the supply of services by way of admission to the exhibition of cinematograph films.
                              2. Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 regarding the reduction in GST rate from 18% to 12%.
                              3. Determination of the profiteered amount and its deposition.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              Issue 1: Alleged Profiteering by the Respondent
                              The case arose from an application alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of GST rate reduction on movie admission tickets from 18% to 12%, effective from 01.01.2019, as per Notification No. 27/2018-Central Tax (Rate) dated 31.12.2018. Instead, the Respondent was accused of increasing the base prices to maintain the same cum-tax selling prices. The investigation by the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) revealed that the Respondent sold tickets at prices not reflecting the GST rate reduction, thus limiting the investigation to the reduced GST rate for three specified categories of tickets.

                              Issue 2: Compliance with Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017
                              Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act mandates that any reduction in the tax rate must be passed on to the recipient by way of a commensurate reduction in prices. The DGAP's investigation found that the Respondent increased the base prices of tickets despite the GST rate reduction, thereby not passing the benefit to the consumers. The Respondent contended that the ticket prices were regulated by the State Government and that he faced practical difficulties in reducing prices. However, the DGAP found no evidence supporting the Respondent's claims and observed that the Respondent's actions did not comply with Section 171.

                              Issue 3: Determination of the Profiteered Amount and its Deposition
                              The DGAP calculated the profiteered amount to be Rs. 2,23,850/- based on the increase in base prices for the period from 01.01.2019 to 30.06.2019. The Respondent was directed to deposit this amount along with interest calculated at 18% from the date of collection until the deposit date. Since the recipients were not identifiable, the amount was to be deposited equally in the Central Consumer Welfare Fund (CWF) and the Telangana State CWF. The Respondent was given three months to comply, failing which the amount would be recovered by the Commissioner CGST and SGST as per the SGST Act, 2017.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Authority found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of GST rate reduction as required under Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017. The Respondent was ordered to reduce ticket prices accordingly and deposit the profiteered amount with interest into the specified welfare funds. The Commissioners of SGST Telangana were directed to monitor compliance, and a report was to be submitted within three months. The Order was passed on 17.11.2020, considering the delay due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found