Concessional GST for works contracts depends on strict notification conditions; electricity project works were held ineligible.

A works contract supplied to a Government entity qualifies for concessional GST only if it strictly satisfies the relevant notification entry conditions, including the requirement that the work be predominantly for non-commercial use or fall within the specified irrigation-related category. The Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. was treated as a Government entity, but not a Governmental authority. The civil works for the Pazhassi Small Hydro Electric Project were held to be connected with electricity generation, transmission and distribution business and did not fit the concessional entries under either the CGST or corresponding SGST notifications. Concessional GST was therefore unavailable.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. is a Government entity for the purpose of the concessional rate notification; (ii) whether the civil works executed for the Pazhassi Small Hydro Electric Project qualify for concessional CGST at 6% under Sl. No. 3(iii) or 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017; (iii) whether the corresponding SGST concessional rate is available under Notification No. SRO 370/2017 dated 30.06.2017.

Issue (i): Whether the Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. is a Government entity for the purpose of the concessional rate notification.

Analysis: The Board was found to be a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with substantial Government participation and engaged in generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. It did not answer the definition of Governmental authority, because it was not shown to be established to perform functions entrusted to a municipality or Panchayat. However, it did fall within the wider definition of Government entity under the relevant exemption notification, and the procurement condition connected with work entrusted by the State Government was also satisfied.

Conclusion: The Board is a Government entity, but not a Governmental authority.

Issue (ii): Whether the civil works executed for the Pazhassi Small Hydro Electric Project qualify for concessional CGST at 6% under Sl. No. 3(iii) or 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

Analysis: Although the contract was held to be a works contract, the supply failed the substantive conditions for the concessional entries. The project-related works were treated as connected with the business of electricity generation, transmission and distribution, and therefore not meant predominantly for use other than commerce, industry or business. The work was also not accepted as civil work for canal, dam or other irrigation works within Sl. No. 3(iii).

Conclusion: The supply is not eligible for concessional CGST at 6% under either Sl. No. 3(iii) or Sl. No. 3(vi).

Issue (iii): Whether the corresponding SGST concessional rate is available under Notification No. SRO 370/2017 dated 30.06.2017.

Analysis: The State GST notification was treated as pari materia with the CGST notification. Since the supply did not satisfy the conditions for concessional CGST, the same result necessarily followed for SGST.

Conclusion: The concessional SGST rate is also not available.

Final Conclusion: The concessional rate of GST claimed on the works contract was held inapplicable, and the advance ruling denying the benefit was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: A works contract supplied to a Government entity is eligible for the concessional rate only if it strictly satisfies the specific entry conditions, including the requirement that the works be predominantly for non-commercial use or fall within the enumerated irrigation-related works.

---