Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the works contract services provided to TANGEDCO for retrofitting and strengthening works were eligible for the concessional GST rate under entry 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and if not, what rate applied.
Analysis: The supply was examined as a composite supply of works contract under section 2(119) of the CGST Act, 2017. Although TANGEDCO was treated as a Government Entity, the concessional entry required the service to be for a civil structure or original work meant predominantly for use other than commerce, industry, or business, and, in the case of a Government Entity, to relate to a work entrusted to that entity by the Government. The work in question related to retrofitting and modification of the headquarters building of TANGEDCO, whose core activity is generation and distribution of electricity on commercial principles. The work was not linked to the entrusted function of generation and distribution of electricity, and therefore the conditions for the concessional entry were not satisfied.
Conclusion: Entry 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) was held inapplicable, and the services were taxed at 18% under the residual entry.