Concessional GST for hydro project civil works denied where recipient's electricity operations were commercial, not non-commercial.

A works contract for civil works in a small hydro electric project was examined for concessional GST under Entry 3(iii) and Entry 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The recipient was treated as a government entity but not a governmental authority, since it was not established to perform municipal or panchayat functions under Articles 243W or 243G. The concessional rate was denied because the civil structure entry required predominantly non-commercial use, while the recipient's electricity generation, transmission and distribution activities were on commercial principles. The canal, dam or irrigation works entry was also held inapplicable because the contract related to civil works within an existing irrigation dam, not construction of such works as such.

---

---

Issues: Whether the civil works awarded for the small hydro electric project qualified for the concessional GST rate under Entry 3(iii) or Entry 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and whether the recipient qualified as a governmental authority or government entity for that purpose.

Analysis: The work was a composite works contract. The recipient was held not to be a governmental authority because it was not established to perform functions entrusted to a municipality or a panchayat under Articles 243W or 243G of the Constitution. It was, however, treated as a government entity. The concessional entry for civil structure use required the structure to be meant predominantly for non-commercial use, but the recipient's functions in generation, transmission and distribution of electricity were on commercial principles. The entry for canal, dam or other irrigation works was also held inapplicable because the contract related to civil works for a small hydro electric project in an existing irrigation dam, not construction of a canal, dam or irrigation work as such.

Conclusion: The work did not qualify for the concessional rate under Entry 3(iii) or Entry 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), and the 6% GST rate was not applicable.

Final Conclusion: The applicant was not entitled to the claimed concessional GST treatment for the work contract, and the ruling went against the applicant on the tax rate issue.

Ratio Decidendi: A works contract supplied to a recipient engaged in commercial electricity operations does not qualify for concessional treatment under the entries reserved for non-commercial civil structures or for canal, dam or irrigation works merely because the project is located within an existing dam area.

---