Review Petition Dismissed for Incorrect Dates: Evidence Required During Final Hearing

The Court dismissed the Review Petition challenging a judgment due to incorrect dates of assessment order publication on the web portal. The Court held that the petitioner should have raised the issue with supporting evidence during the final hearing instead of in a Review Petition. Since the petitioner failed to present such material earlier, the Court found the Review Petition unjustified and advised the petitioner to address the matter in the appellate court with appropriate evidence.

---

---

Issues: Review Petition challenging judgment based on incorrect dates of assessment order publication on web portal.

Analysis:
The petitioner filed a Review Petition seeking to review a judgment in a Writ Petition, alleging that the assessment order dates mentioned in the comparative chart were incorrect. The petitioner argued that the actual dates of publishing the orders on the web portal were later than indicated in the statement filed by the respondents. The Court noted that the statement relied upon was filed on 19.08.2020, the petitioner responded to it, and the final hearing was on 29.09.2020. The Court found that the petitioner's contention about the incorrect dates should have been raised during the final hearing with supporting evidence. Since the petitioner failed to produce such material earlier, the Court held that raising these contentions in a Review Petition was impermissible. The Court emphasized that the petitioner could have presented any relevant material during the final hearing to challenge the factual findings. Therefore, the Court concluded that the Review Petition was not justified and dismissed it. The petitioner was advised to approach the appellate court with any evidence to contest the factual findings in the original judgment.

---