Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Companies Law

        2020 (11) TMI 293 - Tri - Companies Law

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal approves Amalgamation Scheme for cost savings, process efficiency, and shareholder value The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Rosche Trading Private Limited and Fine Tech Corporation Private Limited under sections 230 to ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal approves Amalgamation Scheme for cost savings, process efficiency, and shareholder value

                              The Tribunal sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between Rosche Trading Private Limited and Fine Tech Corporation Private Limited under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The amalgamation was approved to reduce costs, streamline processes, and enhance shareholder value. The Tribunal found the Scheme fair, reasonable, and compliant with legal provisions, directing the Transferee Company to file the Order with authorities and ensure compliance with stamp duty adjudication and Registrar of Companies' requirements. The Scheme was ordered accordingly with the appointed date set as 1st April 2018.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013.
                              2. Compliance with statutory requirements and observations of the Regional Director.
                              3. Impact on shareholders and capital structure.
                              4. Compliance with Accounting Standards.
                              5. Tax implications and compliance with Income Tax laws.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation:
                              The Tribunal was approached for the sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation of Rosche Trading Private Limited (Transferor Company) with Fine Tech Corporation Private Limited (Transferee Company) under sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Scheme was unanimously approved by the respective Board meetings of both companies on 10th September 2018. The rationale for the amalgamation included reducing administrative costs, avoiding duplication of processes, optimizing profitability, and enhancing shareholder value.

                              2. Compliance with Statutory Requirements and Observations of the Regional Director:
                              The Tribunal noted that the Petitioner Companies complied with all directions passed in previous Company Scheme Applications and Petitions. Affidavits of compliance were filed, and the Official Liquidator confirmed that the affairs of the Transferor Company were conducted properly. The Regional Director's observations were addressed in detail, including compliance with Accounting Standards, the appointed date, set-off of fees, serving notices to authorities, and ensuring no discrepancies in the Scheme documents. The Petitioner Companies undertook to comply with all applicable provisions and confirmed that the Scheme was not a device for tax avoidance.

                              3. Impact on Shareholders and Capital Structure:
                              The authorized share capital of the Transferor Company and Transferee Company was detailed. Upon amalgamation, the entire issued, subscribed, and paid-up equity and preference share capital of the Transferor Company would stand extinguished and cancelled. The authorized share capital of the Transferee Company would increase to accommodate the combined authorized share capitals of both companies. No new shares would be issued or allotted to the shareholders of the Transferor Company.

                              4. Compliance with Accounting Standards:
                              The Regional Director's observation on compliance with AS-14 (IND AS-103) and other applicable Accounting Standards was addressed. The Transferee Company undertook to pass necessary accounting entries to comply with these standards. The appointed date was confirmed to be 1st April 2018, in compliance with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs' circular.

                              5. Tax Implications and Compliance with Income Tax Laws:
                              The Income Tax Department's concerns regarding potential tax avoidance through the Scheme were noted. The Petitioner Companies confirmed that the Scheme was not intended for tax avoidance and undertook to comply with all applicable provisions of the Income Tax Act. The Department was assured that it could examine the Scheme's tax implications and take appropriate action if necessary.

                              Conclusion:
                              The Tribunal found the Scheme of Amalgamation to be fair, reasonable, and compliant with legal provisions and public policy. All requisite statutory compliances were fulfilled, and the Scheme was sanctioned with the appointed date fixed as 1st April 2018. The Transferee Company was directed to file the Order with the concerned authorities and ensure compliance with stamp duty adjudication and Registrar of Companies' requirements. The Scheme was ordered accordingly, and the file was consigned to the record.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found