Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the provisions of section 23A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 applied to the assessee for the assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62 on the facts found.
Analysis: The decisive question was whether the dividend declared was unreasonable having regard to the commercial profits available for distribution. The Tribunal had accepted the relevant profit figures on the record and found that the amounts claimed by the revenue, such as the alleged additional reserve and excess depreciation, were not established before it as necessary adjustments to the profits for determining the commercial surplus. On the material before the Tribunal, the declared dividends could not be treated as falling below the standard required to attract section 23A.
Conclusion: Section 23A was held inapplicable for both assessment years, and the assessee succeeded.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the revenue and the Tribunal's view that section 23A did not apply was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For applying section 23A, the relevant test is the commercial profit available for distribution on the basis of the material proved before the Tribunal, and not unsupported additions to book figures.