Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the operational creditor's application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was maintainable and whether the claim was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The application was supported by invoices, reminder letters, the respondent's admissions of liability, and a memorandum of understanding by which the respondent agreed to pay the outstanding amount within a stipulated period. The admitted liability and subsequent acknowledgment of dues were treated as extending the limitation period, and the claim was held to fall within the law of limitation. The record also showed default in payment of the operational debt, and the registered office of the corporate debtor being in Jaipur conferred jurisdiction on the Tribunal to entertain the petition.
Conclusion: The application was held to be maintainable, the debt and default were accepted, and initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process against the corporate debtor was directed.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded and the corporate debtor was brought under the insolvency resolution framework, with moratorium and appointment of the interim resolution professional following admission.
Ratio Decidendi: An acknowledged operational debt, reinforced by subsequent acknowledgment and a payment agreement, can be treated as within limitation for purposes of admission under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.