1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Dismissed: Committee of Creditors lacks post-liquidation authority to remove Liquidator</h1> The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal in New Delhi dismissed the appeal against the appointment of a Liquidator in the Corporate Insolvency ... Liquidation of Corporate Debtor - sections 33 & 34 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - grievance of the Appellant is that he is against the appointment of the Liquidator - HELD THAT:- We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order as after the liquidation the 'Committee of Creditors' has no role to play and they are simply a claimant whose matters are to be determined by the Liquidator and cannot move an application for removal of Liquidator in absence of any provisions under the law. Appeal dismissed. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal against the appointment of a Liquidator in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of M/s. ORG Informatics Ltd. The Committee of Creditors, led by Punjab National Bank, decided to move the application for liquidation, which was accepted by the Adjudicating Authority. The Appellant's grievance was rejected as the Committee of Creditors has no role after liquidation and cannot remove the Liquidator without provisions under the law. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.