TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Interim bail applications denied for NDPS Act offences; insufficient grounds cited.</h1> <h3>Anand Singh S/o Shri Dayal Singh, Deepak Chaukdiwal S/o Satyanarayan Chaukdiwal, Anil Chaukdiwal Versus Union Of India</h3> The court dismissed the interim bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for offences under the NDPS Act, 1985, citing insufficient grounds for ... Bail Application - commercial quantity of contraband - overcrowding in jails - corona positive cases present - HELD THAT:- No ground is made out for entertaining these (interim) bail applications. Bail application dismissed. Issues:Interim bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for offence under Sections 8 R/W Sections 22, 23, 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985.Analysis:The petitioners filed interim bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in response to F.I.R. No.10/2019 for an offence under the NDPS Act, 1985. The petitioners argued that the charge-sheet was extensive, around 3000 pages, and only a pen drive was provided to them, hindering their ability to prepare for the main bail argument. Additionally, concerns were raised about the poor conditions in jail, overcrowding, and the presence of COVID-19 positive prisoners.The Union of India, represented by counsel, opposed the interim bail applications, citing the involvement of a commercial quantity of contraband in the case. They disputed the claims of overcrowding in jails, stating that the jail's capacity was not exceeded. The authorities also reported that most COVID-19 positive prisoners had recovered, and special care was being provided to prisoners with health issues as per the advisory.Upon considering the arguments presented by both parties and reviewing the jail authorities' report, the court found no sufficient grounds to grant the interim bail applications. The court dismissed the bail applications, emphasizing that the contentions raised were not strong enough to warrant bail at this stage. A copy of the order was directed to be placed in the connected files for reference.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
