TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Orders Inclusion of Statutory Interest on Delayed Customs Refunds</h1> <h3>M/s. New Kamal Versus Union Of India</h3> M/s. New Kamal Versus Union Of India - 2020 (372) E.L.T. 571 (Guj.) Issues:Refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on imported goods, entitlement to interest on delayed refund under Section 27-A of the Customs Act.Analysis:1. Refund of SAD: The petitioners, engaged in the trading of used clothes, imported goods liable for customs duties and additional custom duties. They purchased goods from a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) and were entitled to a refund of 4% SAD under Notification No. 102/2007 if the goods were imported for subsequent sale. The petitioners filed refund applications as the SAD was charged for counterbalancing sales tax, VAT, etc., upon subsequent sale in India.2. Delay in Refund: The refund applications were not decided promptly by the customs authorities, leading to delays. The petitioners moved the court through Special Civil Applications seeking the revision and modification of orders to include the statutory interest on the refunded amounts. The court directed the authorities to decide on the refund claims within a specified period.3. Entitlement to Interest: Section 27-A of the Customs Act provides for interest on delayed refunds. The petitioners were entitled to interest on the refunded amounts due to the significant delay in processing their refund claims. The court emphasized that the entitlement to interest under the Customs Act could not be denied, especially when the refund was issued after a substantial delay of over seven years.4. Court's Decision: The court, after considering the submissions from both sides, directed the authorities to revise and modify the refund orders to include the statutory interest as per Section 27-A of the Customs Act. The respondents were instructed to calculate and process the interest amount promptly and pay it to the petitioners within a specified timeframe. The court highlighted the importance of adhering to statutory provisions regarding interest on delayed refunds, ensuring that the petitioners receive their rightful entitlement without further delay.5. Conclusion: The court's judgment focused on upholding the petitioners' right to interest on delayed refunds as stipulated under the Customs Act. By directing the authorities to include the statutory interest in the refund amounts and process the payments promptly, the court ensured that the petitioners received fair compensation for the delays in refund processing. The decision underscored the significance of adhering to legal provisions to protect the rights of individuals and businesses in matters concerning customs duties and refunds.
TaxTMI 