TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court permits correction of appeal numbering error on documents, ensuring fair adjudication</h1> <h3>M/s. JSB Aluminium Versus Commissioner Customs & Central Excise</h3> The court granted permission for the correction/amendment in the title of court documents to rectify an error in appeal numbering, allowing the applicant ... Permission to make necessary correction/amendment in the title, MCC and Meta Data Form - HELD THAT:- CONXP No. 29/2018 and MCC No. 55/2018 had been filed for readmission of EXAP No. 19 of 2013 whereas CONXP no. 24/2018 and MCC No. 143 of 2018 had been filed for re-admission of EXAP No. 24/2013 but inadvertently counsel for the applicant had mentioned EXAP No. 24 of 2013 in the title of both the sets of applications i.e., CONXP No. 29/2018 & MCC No. 55/2018 and CONXP No. 24/2018 and MCC No. 143/2018. It is due to this reason that EXAP No. 19 of 2013 has not been decided. It is, therefore, prayed by the learned counsel for the applicant that necessary correction/amendment in the title of the CONXP No. 29 of 2018 and MCC No. 55 of 2018 and in Meta Data Form be made. The applicant is permitted to make necessary correction/ amendment in the title of the CONXP No. 29 of 2018 and MCC No. 55 of 2018 and Meta Data form before the Registrar Judicial of this Court - Application allowed. Issues:Application for correction/amendment in the title of court documents.Analysis:The applicant filed an application seeking permission to correct/amend the title of CONXP No. 29 of 2018 and MCC No. 55 of 2018 and Meta Data Form. The applicant had previously filed 31 excise appeals, and the court had admitted them, framing substantial questions of law. However, all 39 excise appeals, including the applicant's 31 appeals, were disposed of due to the absence of the counsel for the appellants. Subsequently, the applicant filed applications for readmission of the appeals, which were allowed by the court. The issue arose when the applicant realized that one of the appeals, EXAP No. 19 of 2013, had not been disposed of because the title of CONXP No. 29/2018 and MCC No. 55/2018 mentioned EXAP No. 24 of 2013 instead of EXAP No. 19 of 2013. The applicant requested necessary correction/amendment in the title of the court documents to rectify this error.The court considered the submissions and granted permission for the necessary correction/amendment in the title of CONXP No. 29 of 2018 and MCC No. 55 of 2018 and in the Meta Data Form. The applicant was allowed to make the required changes before the Registrar Judicial of the Court. This decision was made to rectify the inadvertent error made by the counsel for the applicant in mentioning the incorrect appeal number in the title of the court documents, ensuring the proper adjudication of the pending appeal EXAP No. 19 of 2013.
TaxTMI 
