Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, having availed Cenvat credit, could also retain the benefit of abatement under Notification No. 1/2006-ST dated 01.03.2006.
Analysis: The abatement under the notification was available only if Cenvat credit was not availed. The assessee had taken credit on inputs and input services and also claimed the abatement benefit. Once the assessee was treated as having opted for the abatement notification, the credit already availed could not be retained. The objection that the notice proposed denial of credit instead of denial of abatement was held to be only technical and not a valid ground to permit retention of both benefits.
Conclusion: The assessee could not simultaneously avail Cenvat credit and abatement. The Cenvat credit was liable to be reversed, and the issue is answered in favour of the Revenue.