Court Orders Cancellation of Unauthorized PAN and Resolves Society Management Dispute

The court directed the Assessing Officer to cancel the unauthorized party's PAN, reject their filed returns, and resolve the dispute over society management and income tax filings within eight weeks. The court emphasized that the allegations were not admitted without an affidavit and allowed for urgent certified copies of the order to be issued upon request.

---

---

Issues:
1. Dispute over management authority of a society.
2. Allegations of hacking and filing revised income tax returns.
3. Use of the same Permanent Account Number (PAN) by rival groups.
4. Involvement of Income Tax authorities in resolving the dispute.

Analysis:
1. The petitioners claim sole management authority of the society and allege that the rival group has been filing revised income tax returns based on their filings. The respondent, on the other hand, contends that the petitioners hacked into their username and password. The Income Tax authorities have acknowledged the issue and prepared a report for further action.

2. The Income Tax report highlights the ongoing dispute and the unauthorized filing of income tax returns by both groups using the same PAN. The report emphasizes that only one PAN can be issued to an entity under the Income Tax Act, and the Assessing Officer is tasked with determining the authorized party. The Officer is directed to grant a hearing to both parties, examine relevant documents, and issue a reasoned order within a specified timeframe.

3. The court directs the Assessing Officer to cancel the PAN issued to the unauthorized party, reject their filed returns, and communicate the decision to both groups within two weeks of the order. The Officer is instructed to complete the proceedings within eight weeks from the date of communication, effectively resolving the dispute over the management and income tax filings of the society.

4. The writ petition is disposed of with the mentioned directions, emphasizing that the allegations in the petition are not deemed admitted due to the absence of an affidavit requirement. The court also allows for the issuance of an urgent certified copy of the order to the concerned parties upon request.

---