Tribunal grants Revenue's appeals for stats, dismisses assessee's 2008-09 appeal, partly allows 2009-10.

The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeals for statistical purposes, dismissed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2008-09, and partly allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment
2. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D
3. Disallowance of Club Membership and Service Charges

Detailed Analysis:

1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment:
The first issue raised by the Revenue pertains to the deletion of additions on account of transfer pricing adjustments for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10. The Assessing Officer (AO) had referred the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO), who proposed upward adjustments. The CIT(A) deleted these adjustments, agreeing with the assessee's use of the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) for benchmarking. The CIT(A) noted that the TPO had not properly analyzed the comparability of products and rejected the entire documentation based on product dissimilarity without considering the broad similarity of functions, assets, and risks. The CIT(A) also found that the TPO failed to adjust for commission payments when applying the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method. The Tribunal, following its previous decisions, admitted additional evidence and restored the issue to the AO/TPO for reconsideration, directing them to determine the Arm's Length Price (ALP) of the commission paid after considering the additional evidence.

2. Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D:
The second issue involves the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D. For the assessment year 2007-08, the AO disallowed Rs. 12,84,473/- which was deleted by the CIT(A) on the ground that the assessee had not received any exempt income during the year, relying on the Delhi High Court's decisions in Cheminvest Ltd. vs. CIT and CIT vs. Holcim India Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

For the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-10, the AO disallowed Rs. 5,50,945/- and Rs. 11,81,011/- respectively. The CIT(A) upheld these disallowances, noting that the investments were not static and administrative and financial expenditures were likely incurred. The Tribunal found merit in the AO's and CIT(A)'s findings but modified the disallowance for the assessment year 2009-10 to restrict it to the actual dividend income received, which was Rs. 4,21,566/-. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal for 2008-09 and partly allowed the appeal for 2009-10.

3. Disallowance of Club Membership and Service Charges:
The third issue for the assessment year 2009-10 involved the disallowance of Rs. 27,919/- on account of club membership and service charges. The AO disallowed the amount due to lack of evidence from the assessee, and the CIT(A) upheld this decision. The Tribunal, considering the assessee's submission that it could substantiate its claim if given an opportunity, restored the issue to the AO for reconsideration, directing the AO to provide the assessee with a final opportunity to substantiate its claim.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeals for statistical purposes, dismissed the assessee's appeal for the assessment year 2008-09, and partly allowed the appeal for the assessment year 2009-10. The decision was pronounced in the open court on 13.11.2019.

---